Check out the new fantasy games section near the bottom of the forum! As the days go by most every sport based game will be there!!!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The point is, the death penalty should be available for people like him. Unless you think somehow the world would be a better place with him alive.
Why do you want Tsarnaev's ass on the table ? Do you find him attractive, or something ?The point is, the death penalty should be available for people like him. Unless you think somehow the world would be a better place with him alive.
The world would be a better place with him alive. The terrorists are at their most powerful after they dead (in their minds).Feed him rat poison and a glass of water but tell the sandbandits he's alive and well and reads NGS out loud ...that'll piss 'em off
Yawn. Read anything those three have written, and you realize the court is definitely not too liberal.
I'm thinking we make him a special cell that is surrounded by a pig farm and the interior has a painted mural of Muhammad eating shellfish.
I would love to hear the argument on this. Personally I think we should do away with the death penalty, but I don't really want it banned (there are a few extreme cases where it should be applied) and I don't see anyway you can argue the founding fathers were opposed to it.The court has gotten way too liberal and I'm not saying that because of the current rulings I'm basing that statement on the fact that 2 justices would make the quoted statement.
Oh, they're terrible and horribly biased too. But there's only three of them, and more than balanced out by Sotomayor, Kagan and Breyer. Ginsburg's nearly as bad. That court's never healed from Stevens & Rehnquist leaving- those guys were conservative asses too, but at least they didn't compromise judicial integrity and their oath to the Constitution.
BT makes a very good argument against the death penalty. He used the wording in the Constitution itself.I don't like the ruling but that is purely because I do not agree with the death penalty itself. For once Catholics and liberals are on the same side. How ironic.
You didn't think Stevens and Rehnquist were more responsible than the Justices who came after them ?
The Conservatives don't want a small carrot, though.They want the big salami!!!
Actually a Delmonico Steak grilled and smoked with mesquite and a cold beer
Only a hayseed would smoke a Delmonico ...
Prisons are overcrowded anyway. Granted much of that is due to that failed war on drugs, but no point in wasting money keeping scum like him alive. Maybe drop him into the jungle somewhere.
We need the death penalty because we can't send them to the moon permanently
Unless you've tried it, don't be so cynical. I know what you're saying though..... kinda like mixing Crown with Coke
But if we somehow got them there, they could never escape.
My point. Separate them permanently from society. No parole, no support, no education. You are here til you die, today, tomorrow, 20 years from now.
So what difference would it make to you then, if someone, like say BT, gave em a one-way kool-aid?